This is the dumbest f-ing idea ever. You do this and people will stop making locks around their bases and they will just bubble them instead while they are hitting. At least with the locks there is a chance to break them if you have fast internet.
I like the idea, but what about the self bubbling, many players using other accounts to bubble them main bases while attacking, or calling another freind to attack them and get 1 star... That means a victory for that platoon and it wont sent back to the base with 0 Morale!
To fight this im suggesting a perma dammage protection for all players being attacked from the same player, i mean if u get attacked by a player he can't attack u back for a limited time like warpath, e.g: if u gt attacked by X player u'll get the actual 36hours for ur base, and 36hrs protection from that X player, if u pop that bubble many will be able to attack u again but that X player!
Well 36hrs is way too long, but a 12hrs should be a good period to stop that player hitting the same base for a 69..
This wont work for the genuine cases where an enemy keeps poping and nobody can hit him back. maybe a 10 min window would help but that's about it.
Tottal agree with ya! And my idea needs an improvement ofc.. 10min or 7min also could work
Ring of fire never works in our sector thgeres to many of us on fast nets and smart devices and the friendlies have always been a part of the game since live battles and thorium infamy ect but if your going to make a change to it why not make the base PvP like warpath but you can only attack a base once every four hours or any certain time thats just an example
This is the dumbest f-ing idea ever. You do this and people will stop making locks around their bases and they will just bubble them instead while they are hitting. At least with the locks there is a chance to break them if you have fast internet.
well bro it seems ur only smart one here lol :P
fast net is usually useless against people that use click bots. they can stay locked as long as they want
don't read the post too long or you might not see me coming up behind you.
This is the dumbest f-ing idea ever. You do this and people will stop making locks around their bases and they will just bubble them instead while they are hitting. At least with the locks there is a chance to break them if you have fast internet.
Figures you wouldn't agree with this. This is your favorite tactic. I have vids showing your restart attack's in under 1 sec keeping people from breaking through the ring of fire.
One thing - I like to surround my base with strong plats to make attackers take damage just to get in. I would not want them to be able to send my plats home for free by just attacking them with a buggy (usually from a low level account) & then waiting for the time to run out.
This is the dumbest f-ing idea ever. You do this and people will stop making locks around their bases and they will just bubble them instead while they are hitting. At least with the locks there is a chance to break them if you have fast internet.
Figures you wouldn't agree with this. This is your favorite tactic. I have vids showing your restart attack's in under 1 sec keeping people from breaking through the ring of fire.
IF I am reading this correctly basically if a player designs 6 powerful platoons that they worked their butts off for in war commander and someone else attacks them while their offline the defending players platoons will be sent to their bases after so long and then their bases will be wide open for hits while the defender is offline. So basically your fixing a game "tactic" with an exploit which will be exploited. Basically if were offline the defender is now more screwed then he/she was to begin with. With this update we cannot even put 6 of our own hard-earned units/platoons around our bases and defend ourselves.
it sends the defeated toon back, if you dont kill a toon in a tvt battle its a loss, in that scenario the attacker would be sent back to base.
"the optimist looks up and loses his footing. the pessimist looks down and loses the path the strategist looks forward and adjusts accordingly"
This is the dumbest f-ing idea ever. You do this and people will stop making locks around their bases and they will just bubble them instead while they are hitting. At least with the locks there is a chance to break them if you have fast internet.
Figures you wouldn't agree with this. This is your favorite tactic. I have vids showing your restart attack's in under 1 sec keeping people from breaking through the ring of fire.
dont blame people who love my 69 technique plz
Rick this reply was not towards you get over yourself.
i for one like this, people are no longer going to be able to be p*ssies and hide behind 30 toons attacking eachother. the only issue i have is, i am much like Pascal, when i go to bed, if i haven't been flattened online by an enemy, i have a friend give me a 1 star so when i wake up and get in game the next day, i can pop and have fun again without giving someone a free shot at my base while i'm offline. might i suggest instead of doing all this re-writing, just re-write the DropShip spec op to where it can stack and unlimited amount of times, and dropships can attack other dropships??? make them 25k medals each in the gear store IDC, just making it so DropShips can stack unlimited takes away from people "red ring" thier base or "69ing" . to clarify, the act of 69ing, is having someone bubble your base while you flatten someone else, THAT is what's annoying, THAT is what needs to stop
How exactly will this fix the 69? are you sure you are trying to fix the same 69 we have been talking about?? Ring of fire can always be counter attack, but not the ACTUAL 69 where there guy gets the bubble himself...
i for one like this, people are no longer going to be able to be p*ssies and hide behind 30 toons attacking eachother. the only issue i have is, i am much like Pascal, when i go to bed, if i haven't been flattened online by an enemy, i have a friend give me a 1 star so when i wake up and get in game the next day, i can pop and have fun again without giving someone a free shot at my base while i'm offline. might i suggest instead of doing all this re-writing, just re-write the DropShip spec op to where it can stack and unlimited amount of times, and dropships can attack other dropships??? make them 25k medals each in the gear store IDC, just making it so DropShips can stack unlimited takes away from people "red ring" thier base or "69ing" . to clarify, the act of 69ing, is having someone bubble your base while you flatten someone else, THAT is what's annoying, THAT is what needs to stop
bro i dont know what even to say.. thats a briliant idea, i like it, ur smart, keep going actually we should start a vote about dropships coz they can solve this problem
* Will you have a bar that says how much moral a platoon has? * How many battles can a platoon lose before running away? * will there be modifiers to how much moral is lost? for example if one player kills a juggernaught in the enemy platoon but it took him the 6 minutes of an attack to do so, does the fact that the platoon had a statistical victory over the other platoon affect how much moral is lost? * does this affect pve?
If a platoon is in a Low Morale state, there will be an icon showing that. Platoons that are not in Low Morale will appear as normal.
Two PVP losses without returning to base will cause the platoon to retreat.
That is a good suggestion for the future. Right now, there are only two proposed states: Full Morale, or Low Morale.
One thing - I like to surround my base with strong plats to make attackers take damage just to get in. I would not want them to be able to send my plats home for free by just attacking them with a buggy (usually from a low level account) & then waiting for the time to run out.
It's only the losing platoon which will be send back home automatically. If they won't be able to destroy your platoon if I have read it correctly, they should still stand on the map.
* Will you have a bar that says how much moral a platoon has? * How many battles can a platoon lose before running away? * will there be modifiers to how much moral is lost? for example if one player kills a juggernaught in the enemy platoon but it took him the 6 minutes of an attack to do so, does the fact that the platoon had a statistical victory over the other platoon affect how much moral is lost? * does this affect pve?
If a platoon is in a Low Morale state, there will be an icon showing that. Platoons that are not in Low Morale will appear as normal.
Two PVP losses without returning to base will cause the platoon to retreat.
That is a good suggestion for the future. Right now, there are only two proposed states: Full Morale, or Low Morale.
No, it does not.
Regards, Goldendoodle
thank you : )
"the optimist looks up and loses his footing. the pessimist looks down and loses the path the strategist looks forward and adjusts accordingly"
You spoke repeatedly about "69ing" but throughout your rhetoric it sounded as if you were actually addressing what is referred to as "the ring of fire". To 69 is to attack a friend's base while they attack your base netting the end result of you both in bubbles. Is that now an exploit or just the ring of fire? Your terminology is confusing.
You spoke repeatedly about "69ing" but throughout your rhetoric it sounded as if you were actually addressing what is referred to as "the ring of fire". To 69 is to attack a friend's base while they attack your base netting the end result of you both in bubbles. Is that now an exploit or just the ring of fire? Your terminology is confusing.
It could then be because this term has got multiple different definitions. I do prefer the term "Ring of Fire" mainly due to the fact that it's a bit more self explaining.
For those who aren't experienced with some of the W terms created by the community. The "Ring of Fire" is derived from platoons attacking around a base like a ring and fire is a different word for platoon fighting. On the other hand, I have no clue about the origin of the term called "69ing".
You spoke repeatedly about "69ing" but throughout your rhetoric it sounded as if you were actually addressing what is referred to as "the ring of fire". To 69 is to attack a friend's base while they attack your base netting the end result of you both in bubbles. Is that now an exploit or just the ring of fire? Your terminology is confusing.
It could then be because this term has got multiple different definitions. I do prefer the term "Ring of Fire" mainly due to the fact that it's a bit more self explaining.
For those who aren't experienced with some of the W terms created by the community. The "Ring of Fire" is derived from platoons attacking around a base like a ring and fire is a different word for platoon fighting. On the other hand, I have no clue about the origin of the term called "69ing".
the origin of 69ing is a bit too adult for the forums but if you remember what the community used to call bubbles then you can probably get the idea
"the optimist looks up and loses his footing. the pessimist looks down and loses the path the strategist looks forward and adjusts accordingly"
You spoke repeatedly about "69ing" but throughout your rhetoric it sounded as if you were actually addressing what is referred to as "the ring of fire". To 69 is to attack a friend's base while they attack your base netting the end result of you both in bubbles. Is that now an exploit or just the ring of fire? Your terminology is confusing.
It could then be because this term has got multiple different definitions. I do prefer the term "Ring of Fire" mainly due to the fact that it's a bit more self explaining.
For those who aren't experienced with some of the W terms created by the community. The "Ring of Fire" is derived from platoons attacking around a base like a ring and fire is a different word for platoon fighting. On the other hand, I have no clue about the origin of the term called "69ing".
the origin of 69ing is a bit too adult for the forums but if you remember what the community used to call bubbles then you can probably get the idea
Secondly: from this point forward, we consider “69ing” an exploit.
What do you think?
Regards,
Goldendoodle
What do I think?
Its laughable
So from now on you consider it an exploit?
I'm fine with that but what will be the consequences?
Are you telling me your going to ban players who uses this tactic daily with help to maintain his infamy?
And I read this here and then see CMS video commending the infamy leaders and discussing the rewards they will be receiving soon for using this exploit and others such as using alt accounts to farm infamy for the accounts on the leaderboard. I get confused if you really want to stop it all
Your about to SIGNIFICANTLY reward the very players that use these exploits on a daily basis
There isnt a single player 5k infamy and above that isnt using this exploit and other infamy maintaining exploit every day...... you think anyone in the top 25 has hit ANY base other then a "collector base" in months???
Go ahead and take this out of play....I'm cool with that but until you stop rewarding and praising the known exploiters out there then your words ring hollow to me
You spoke repeatedly about "69ing" but throughout your rhetoric it sounded as if you were actually addressing what is referred to as "the ring of fire". To 69 is to attack a friend's base while they attack your base netting the end result of you both in bubbles. Is that now an exploit or just the ring of fire? Your terminology is confusing.
It could then be because this term has got multiple different definitions. I do prefer the term "Ring of Fire" mainly due to the fact that it's a bit more self explaining.
For those who aren't experienced with some of the W terms created by the community. The "Ring of Fire" is derived from platoons attacking around a base like a ring and fire is a different word for platoon fighting. On the other hand, I have no clue about the origin of the term called "69ing".
I call it the "p_ssy circle" because that's what the people using it are...
You spoke repeatedly about "69ing" but throughout your rhetoric it sounded as if you were actually addressing what is referred to as "the ring of fire". To 69 is to attack a friend's base while they attack your base netting the end result of you both in bubbles. Is that now an exploit or just the ring of fire? Your terminology is confusing.
It could then be because this term has got multiple different definitions. I do prefer the term "Ring of Fire" mainly due to the fact that it's a bit more self explaining.
For those who aren't experienced with some of the W terms created by the community. The "Ring of Fire" is derived from platoons attacking around a base like a ring and fire is a different word for platoon fighting. On the other hand, I have no clue about the origin of the term called "69ing".
I call it the "p_ssy circle" because that's what the people using it are...
Tottal agree with ya! And my idea needs an improvement ofc.. 10min or 7min also could work
Figures you wouldn't agree with this. This is your favorite tactic. I have vids showing your restart attack's in under 1 sec keeping people from breaking through the ring of fire.
I would not want them to be able to send my plats home for free by just attacking them with a buggy (usually from a low level account) & then waiting for the time to run out.
"the optimist looks up and loses his footing.
the pessimist looks down and loses the path
the strategist looks forward and adjusts accordingly"
Rick this reply was not towards you get over yourself.
Ring of fire can always be counter attack, but not the ACTUAL 69 where there guy gets the bubble himself...
- If a platoon is in a Low Morale state, there will be an icon showing that. Platoons that are not in Low Morale will appear as normal.
- Two PVP losses without returning to base will cause the platoon to retreat.
- That is a good suggestion for the future. Right now, there are only two proposed states: Full Morale, or Low Morale.
- No, it does not.
Regards,Goldendoodle
<|= 0302 0320 1310 1220 1211 0200 1313 1233 1302 1210 0230 =|>
<|= 0200 1211 0310 1303 0321 1301 1311 1221 1312 0312 1201 =|>
<|= 1230 1221 1211 0230 0320 0301 1232 1203 1211 0200 1221 =|>
<|= 1232 0200 1201 0302 0200 1210 0320 1221 1203 0232 1310 =|>
<|= 0232 1221 1233 1232 1201 1302 1321 0232 0232 0332 1331 =|>
"the optimist looks up and loses his footing.
the pessimist looks down and loses the path
the strategist looks forward and adjusts accordingly"
Great solution ! Hope this will happen soon !
For those who aren't experienced with some of the W terms created by the community. The "Ring of Fire" is derived from platoons attacking around a base like a ring and fire is a different word for platoon fighting. On the other hand, I have no clue about the origin of the term called "69ing".
<|= 0302 0320 1310 1220 1211 0200 1313 1233 1302 1210 0230 =|>
<|= 0200 1211 0310 1303 0321 1301 1311 1221 1312 0312 1201 =|>
<|= 1230 1221 1211 0230 0320 0301 1232 1203 1211 0200 1221 =|>
<|= 1232 0200 1201 0302 0200 1210 0320 1221 1203 0232 1310 =|>
<|= 0232 1221 1233 1232 1201 1302 1321 0232 0232 0332 1331 =|>
"the optimist looks up and loses his footing.
the pessimist looks down and loses the path
the strategist looks forward and adjusts accordingly"
Loool
What do I think?
Its laughable
So from now on you consider it an exploit?
I'm fine with that but what will be the consequences?
Are you telling me your going to ban players who uses this tactic daily with help to maintain his infamy?
And I read this here and then see CMS video commending the infamy leaders and discussing the rewards they will be receiving soon for using this exploit and others such as using alt accounts to farm infamy for the accounts on the leaderboard. I get confused if you really want to stop it all
Your about to SIGNIFICANTLY reward the very players that use these exploits on a daily basis
There isnt a single player 5k infamy and above that isnt using this exploit and other infamy maintaining exploit every day...... you think anyone in the top 25 has hit ANY base other then a "collector base" in months???
Go ahead and take this out of play....I'm cool with that but until you stop rewarding and praising the known exploiters out there then your words ring hollow to me
How you going to protect your benefactor now???
Believe me we are ready to screenshot and report you
every infamy lover r a 69 lover
like if i try a event base for few times or shadow ops base few time is my toon going home too?