This is NOT the forum for War Commander web. For that forum, go here: https://www.kixeye.com/forum/categories/war-commander

War Commander: Rogue Assault is a new mobile title from KIXEYE. Any topics created that are not about WC:RA will be moved to the appropriate forum.

Request to create/reopen 44-57 war zone

boredbear
boredbear
Greenhorn
Joined Mar 2017 Posts: 3

I would like to request to create/reopen 44-57 war zone. The current 44-65 war zones are so unfair to players on 40s or 50s level. Look at Normandy, it is like a ghost town, every 40s or 50s player once landed will be wiped out (and taken away metal and Thorium) from several 60s players. This has caused most of my alliance players NOT willing to play and be as inactive for a long time because we can't do anything and it is too unfair.

So I would like to request to add a new zone for 44-57, or convert 1 of existing 44-65 to be for 44-57, so that there can be a home for those 40s and low 50s players. Thanks

  • TJCart
    TJCart
    Greenhorn
    Joined Mar 2017 Posts: 19
    They addressed this in the last podcast. "Go f*** yourself" may be a little bit too harsh of a paraphrase, but the lead designer certainly did have a good laugh about the issue at those "mid-range" player's expense. He mentioned that it may be considered in a future update, but certainly didn't give the impression that it was a priority or that they had much sympathy for your plight.
  • FireCorp
    FireCorp
    Moderator
    Joined Mar 2017 Posts: 63
    The more positive the feedback that Customer service gets, the higher the possibility of affecting positive change.  The more intense negative feedback that is given, the less likely of affecting positive change.  I have stated to Customer Service that the segregation of the players levels is one of the things that keeps me here.  I like the overall fairness of keeping higher powered players away from lower powered players.  If this type of change is to be a priority to the players, then a good deal of repeated positive feedback sent into the Customer Service Managers is a good thing... even after podcasts plans can change quickly in the gaming business.  Especially when players are providing consistent  and unified "positive" feedback.
  • boredbear
    boredbear
    Greenhorn
    Joined Mar 2017 Posts: 3

    Well That is harsh. I do know many 40s 50s players, not only on my alliance but also from many other alliances are NOT active anymore due to this zoning issue. A suggestion is to have 1 or 2 of 44-57 zone, and then a 54-65 zone. Otherwise I don't see much players willing to participate the upcoming event at all. 44-65 is too big range.. Thanks

  • FireCorp
    FireCorp
    Moderator
    Joined Mar 2017 Posts: 63
    Maybe you could ask some of them to post their suggestions regarding map levels here as well.  That might help expedite things.  Just tell them to keep it positive because positive feedback beats the negative feedback any day.  
  • drlgamer
    drlgamer
    Potential Threat
    Joined Jan 2017 Posts: 31

    I agree with cart to a point here. The message came across as he described it. They have known about our desire to have a zone for the 44-57 bracket for a while. People in our alliance have been seeking an answer for this question since early this year. Swag has noticed and has responded but the response has been the same up until this podcast.

    When I heard both of them laughing and talking about how fun it was to beat up on the little guys, I pretty much got the message there. As it stands for me personally, if this event turns into a troll fest for the 64s and the LM strongholds are cracked up to 20 on a scale of 10, I will stop playing. Laughing and knudging elbows was the last thing I expected to hear from the people that are supposed to help us out. It Really disappointed me, truely. I expected a better, more professional approach to this bullying issue.

Sign In or Register to comment.