James Ferguson wrote: »
I see this as doing very little to promote game balance, actually widening the gap between those who have dreads and those who don't have dreads. Just a thought Kixeye how about some of the things people actually wanted like a more sensible bubble system to deter abuse, or the alliance feature, or wait wait I know give us back the attack fleet button again . Quit giving us crap we don't want and focus on the things we do.
Goyan wrote: »
With that many people being against the idea, giving or not constructive feedback and alternative ideas, they will go on with it for sure. As someone pointed out already, just look at any ship in your dock...
Maybe people would like more comunication than just "it's being worked on". All these people might not share the same views as you Rumseeker, but they are just as passionate for this game and have their concerns.
And while we're at it, if the attack button is not coming back, we would like to see the FvF part of the game come back anyways. If the tactical modules are to affect FvF, there should be FvF in the first place, therefor it's very related to the tactical lab release and should be part of this thread.
I know that for you FvF is still there (well, you claim it is), but for many other poeple it is not. I do once in while go in a neighbor sector, attack some salvaging fleets in hopes for some fun PvP. It's true that it doesn't take long for 10 or so fleets to appear around me. But after 1 or max 2 fights all the viewers see my Cudas and then start to "dance" to avoid battle (even if I'm far from the best sub driver), and you know why ? Because of the crazy long repair times. Any games deal with the same : a balance between risk and reward. And in this case, people have to risk very long repair times for what... nothing but bragging rights. And tactical modules won't change that fact.
You might be laughing at the guy who asked for a way to intercept fleets, but forgot to say "working on, per Paul"...
KIXEYE CM Swag wrote: »
Thanks to those of you that have provided solid feedback. At the same time, there have been far too many people posting complete nonsense, getting way off track and having discussions. Read the rules for the Future Features & Feedback forum. Those that habitually disregard these rules are going to start getting suspensions.
[email protected] wrote: »
Kixeye doesn't even listen to want the players want. They assume this is what we want. This isn't going to be battle Pirates, it will be high tech wars.
KIXEYE, PLAYERS WANT A SHIPYARD THAT WILL ALLOW THEM TO BUILD OR REFIT MORE THAN ONE SHIP AT A TIME, NOT SOME ELECTRO MAGNETIC BULLSHIT!
Listen to your clientele, or I foresee you company going bellyup because of lost revenues, from one simple thing, YOU WOULDN'T"T LISTEN TO YOUR GAMERS!
Look what happened the the major 3 auto makers in the US (Ford, GM and Chrysler), they thought that Americans wanted this and started to make this, their sales dropped. Ford and GM wouldn't listen to the market, but Chrysler did and they pulled themselves out of the hole. That was all because they paid attention to what the people wanted.
YOUR GAMERS DON'T WANT ANY FANCY MANCY HIGH TECH STUFF, THEY JUST WANT A WAY TO CATCH UP WITH ALL THE HULLS THAT YOU HAVE SHOVED AT US! TO DO THAT, WE NEED A SHIPYARD THAT EITHER HAS SHORTER BUILD TIMES OR HAS THE ABILITY TO BUILD/REFIT MORE THAN ONE SHIP AT A TIME!
defeter23 wrote: »
I honestly dont know why everyone is critizing this.It sounds pretty cool.Will definitley give the mid level players such as myself a better chance i think.
Rumseeker wrote: »
lol Read much?
First off they are working on the second shipyard. They've already said this. Second, THAT does not belong in this thread. Read the sticky, it saves you looking all stupid when a MOD removes your post. There is a WISHLIST area for a reason.
Rickochette wrote: »
LMAO... Rum, with all the people agreeing with him you just sound like the Syrian Forum police.